Trust & safety
Give review teams a structured starting point when user-submitted media raises questions about origin, manipulation or synthetic content.
AI Fake Scan is building an evidence-led media intelligence layer to help organizations investigate AI-generated and manipulated images and video—then move each case into the right human workflow.
It’s where did this file come from, what can the evidence support, what remains unknown—and who needs to act next? Enterprise review needs more than a confident-looking score. It needs context that can travel with the case.
Explore a common evidence layer that can be shaped around your process, policies and review capacity.
Give review teams a structured starting point when user-submitted media raises questions about origin, manipulation or synthetic content.
Shape an intake workflow for media checks, evidence capture and human review across high-volume content operations.
Bring provenance, visible markers and media inspection into a repeatable verification process before a story moves forward.
Explore how media evidence could support existing escalation paths for impersonation, synthetic identity and suspicious submissions.
These are target workflows, not customer deployments or a claim that every listed use case is currently supported.
The product direction is to make media checks legible to both machines and people: preserve the signals, show their coverage, and leave decisions with the right owner.
A controlled path for submitting a media asset and the context your workflow already holds.
Run available checks across file context, provenance, visible markers and supported image or video signals.
Return evidence and coverage in distinct fields, with uncertainty represented explicitly.
Send the case to the right queue, policy or human reviewer in your own system.
Evidence has boundaries. Credentials can document declared edits, not prove the full scene. Missing markers are not proof of authenticity. Passive visual findings remain inconclusive until calibration supports a stronger claim.
Read the methodologyWe’re shaping an API-led path for teams that need media inspection inside an existing product, moderation queue or case-management system. Start with your workflow; define the right inputs, outputs and review controls together.
{
"case_id": "case_example",
"status": "review_required",
"media": { "type": "video", "coverage": ["provenance", "frames"] },
"evidence": [
{ "signal": "content_credentials", "state": "not_found" },
{ "signal": "passive_visual", "state": "inconclusive" }
],
"next_step": "human_review"
}Illustrative schema only. This endpoint is not live, and the example is not a production response.
Enterprise readiness starts with accountable claims, predictable handling and an honest boundary between automation and human judgment.
Keep provenance, file context and visual signals distinct. Make an inconclusive result a valid outcome.
Use signals to prioritize investigation. Don’t treat an automated scan as proof about a person or an event.
Review retention, access and data flows against the published privacy terms before planning a deployment.
Read our privacy policyTell us what your team needs to review, how decisions get made today and where evidence should land. We’ll map the opportunity and the open questions together.